“You can’t manage what you don’t measure” is a widely-accepted rule for managing any operation or process. Makes sense, but the question remains, which and how many individual metrics should be measured to monitor the health of the Accounts Receivable (AR) asset and operations? There are many useful AR metrics and KPIs for gauging the health of the asset. The task of reducing them to just five is not easy, but here they are: Use these for your organization’s accounts receivable performance review.
1. Credit Metrics
Average Days to Complete a New Credit Review
This is the elapsed time from receipt of a credit application to the assignment of a credit limit. Given the critical need for additional revenue experienced by most companies in the pandemic economy, this accounts receivable KPI is judged to be more important now than a risk rating of the AR portfolio.
Hackett’s World Class performance benchmark is two days. Achieving this performance level requires an on-line credit application with digital signature and automatic integration with credit bureaus, banks, etc.
2. Collections Metrics
Average Days Delinquent
This AR metric measures the gap between actual DSO and the best possible DSO, thereby eliminating the impact of granting extended payment terms.
To achieve Hackett’s World Class performance benchmark of four days, automated, customized collection prioritization logic which drives collector activity and automation of contacts is required.
3. Cash Application Metrics
Auto-Cash Hit Rate
This measures the percentage of customer payments automatically applied to open invoices without any manual involvement. To achieve Hackett’s World Class performance benchmark of 75%, AI driven, automated extraction of remit data from multiple sources in multiple formats and application to open invoices, enhanced by machine learning, is a must.
4. Deductions Metrics
Average Resolution Cycle Time
This measures the elapsed time from when a deduction is created in cash application to when it is cleared from the AR ledger or assigned for collection. A short cycle time indicates high productivity and enhances the probability of collecting invalid deductions. Hackett’s World Class performance benchmark is seven days. Achieving this requires AI driven, automated, deduction creation and assignment of reason code, via extracting data from customer vendor portals and remit information from multiple sources in multiple formats.
5. Credit to Cash
Cost of the Credit to Cash Processes as a % of Revenue
This is a cold, simple measure of efficiency. Hackett’s World Class performance benchmark is 0.04%. While best practice processes are important, efficiency of this level requires AI-driven accounts receivable automation that reduces 70 – 80% of manual and semi-manual work in these five functions.
Apart from these accounts receivable metrics, there are two pitfalls that one needs to avoid when measuring the health of the AR processes and operations:
- Inability to quickly assess the status and emerging problems from failing to measuring the right metrics
- Devoting too much human resource to compiling and reporting. Every hour spent reporting results reduces the effort available to drive results
Watch a MasterClass video on accounts receivable metrics
The objectives of accounts receivable reporting are to measure the effectiveness and efficiency of managing the AR asset, to provide a level (but not a deep dive) of insight into the operations and challenges, and to minimize the time and effort of reporting.
A prerequisite to effective and efficient AR reporting is to have a single, consolidated, global view of it with full detail by customer and by transaction. Without this view, there is a significant risk of missing elements and of expending far too much time and effort on compiling the single view and reporting.
So in order to drive improvements in your order fulfillment, customer experience, cash flow, bad debt risk, and staff productivity we strongly urge you to track these five key metrics.